US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 2,490
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Moore v. Tulsa County District Court
as 4:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Thomas Allen Moore
Defendant:
Tulsa County District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Buss et al
as 4:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Channen Ray Ozell Smith
Defendant:
David Buss, Getner Drummond and Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jolliff v. Rogers County Sheriff's Department, The et al
as 4:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kathy Jolliff
Defendant:
Rogers County Sheriff's Department, The, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stevens v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00053
Petitioner:
Rodger D. Stevens
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Decker v. Tulsa Housing Authority
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Troy Decker
Defendant:
Tulsa Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sims v. Sweet
as 4:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Shaynna Lauren Sims
Respondent:
Christe Sweet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Woods v. City of Claremore et al
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Lance Martel Woods
Defendant:
City of Claremore, Claremore City Police Department, Stan Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopper v. County of Tulsa et al
as 4:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Keith-Dewane Hopper
Defendant:
County of Tulsa, Vic Regalado, S Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pack v. Jim et al
as 4:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Darrion Pack
Defendant:
Jeremiah Jim, Jessica Kelly and Darrin Varnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
