US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 609
Phillips v. Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County et al
as 4:2018cv00671
Defendant:
David B Parker, Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County and Vic Regalado
Plaintiff:
James Michael Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2018cv00627
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Dick Connor Correction Center
Petitioner:
Christopher Eugene Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rich v. Moore et al
as 4:2018cv00624
Defendant:
Nic Karlstint, Chance Wynn and Harlen Moore
Plaintiff:
John Benton Rich, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wirtz v. Regalado et al
as 4:2018cv00599
Defendant:
Vic Regalado, William Cooper, Turn Key Health Clinics and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Wirtz, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stiltner v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2018cv00576
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Stiltner
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Tulsa County, Kenny Elmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGill v. United States of America
as 4:2018cv00506
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Tracy Joevaun McGill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Southern v. Russel et al
as 4:2018cv00475
Defendant:
Mathew Russel and Hector Rios
Plaintiff:
Wesley W Southern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Allbaugh et al
as 4:2018cv00472
Plaintiff:
Miss Glenn A Porter
Defendant:
Greg Williams, Michelle Lehnus, Dr Joel McCurdy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Routt v. Hansford et al
as 4:2018cv00439
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Dustin Hansford and Joshua Lankford
Plaintiff:
John Stephen Routt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Dowling et al
as 4:2018cv00430
Defendant:
Nurse CC, Bethany Wagener, Nurse Rebera and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin M Brown, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
