US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,278
Prichard v. Montgomery et al
as 5:2023cv01077
Plaintiff:
Ryan Prichard
Defendant:
Ronald Montgomery and Devane Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State of Oklahoma v. Thompson
as 5:2023cv01080
Plaintiff:
State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
Donell Thompson, Jr. corp. sole doing business as Donell Jr Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Poindexter v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
Jim Poindexter
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc, Timms FNU and Nurse Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gaines v. Spitner et al
as 5:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
Trevon D. Gaines
Defendant:
Mrs. Spitner, Mrs. Birdshead, Mr. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowens v. Rogers County Sheriffs Office
as 5:2023cv01054
Plaintiff:
Don Bowens
Defendant:
Rogers County Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wraspir v. Custer County Jail
as 5:2023cv01065
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Tyler Wraspir
Defendant:
Custer County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chester v. Minst et al
as 5:2023cv01045
Plaintiff:
Allie Thomas Chester
Defendant:
Ray Minst, Stacy Randolph, Abel Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sherfield et al v. Diaz et al
as 5:2023cv01037
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Sherfield, Sr, Leslie R Loyd, Taufano CT Guyton and others
Defendant:
FNU Diaz, FNU Leath and Mike Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Guyton v. Diaz et al
as 5:2023cv01035
Plaintiff:
Taufano CT Guyton
Defendant:
FNU Diaz, FNU Leath, Mike Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loyd v. Diaz et al
as 5:2023cv01036
Plaintiff:
Leslie Rashad Loyd
Defendant:
FNU Diaz, FNU Leath and Mike Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
