Oklahoma Labor Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 320
Mode et al v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 6:2013cv00069
Plaintiff:
Joshua Mode , Robert Johnston , Rocky Makovy and others
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109 Employee Protections
Glasco v. Advanced Dental Implant & Denture Center LLC et al
as 5:2013cv00130
Plaintiff:
Vicki L Glasco
Defendant:
Advanced Dental Implant & Denture Center LLC , Advanced Dental Implant and Denture Center Inc and My Dentist Holdings LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ennis v. Donahoe
as 4:2013cv00055
Plaintiff:
Hardle Ennis, Jr
Defendant:
Patrick R Donahoe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Livshee v. Woodward City of
as 5:2012cv01411
Plaintiff:
Mindi E Livshee
Defendant:
Woodward City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brown v. Glanz et al
as 4:2012cv00587
Plaintiff:
Megan Brown
Defendant:
Stanley Glanz and Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Miller v. Nordam Group, Inc., The
as 4:2012cv00563
Plaintiff:
Sharon K Miller
Defendant:
Nordam Group, Inc., The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Karnwie v. Stat Imaging Solutions LLC
as 5:2012cv00979
Plaintiff:
Julius G Karnwie
Defendant:
Stat Imaging Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rawson v. Alorica, Inc.
as 4:2012cv00450
Plaintiff:
Alyssa C Rawson
Defendant:
Alorica, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jones v. Creoks Mental Health Services
as 6:2012cv00332
Plaintiff:
Carlen D. Jones
Defendant:
Creoks Mental Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
McKee v. Osage Nursing Homes, Inc.
as 4:2012cv00383
Defendant:
Osage Nursing Homes, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David McKee, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
