US District Court for the District of Oregon Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 10,124
Mugavero v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00141
Petitioner:
John Mugavero
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Aguilar-Valdovinos v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00143
Petitioner:
Diego Aguilar-Valdovinos
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dickson v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00142
Petitioner:
Joseph Daniel Dickson
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Murray et al v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray and Mandi S. Squire
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Doctor to be Named and Department Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barton v. Bower et al
as 6:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Dale Alan Barton
Defendant:
Andrew L. Bower, MD, Michelle Davies, Warren Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barajas v. USA
as 3:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
Eric Ulyses Barajas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Zambrano v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
Gustavo Zambrano
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cadabas-Barragan v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00103
Petitioner:
Kevin Cadabas-Barragan
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rios v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
Fernando Rios
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Carr v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Michael Carr
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
