US District Court for the District of Oregon Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 211 - 220 of 10,123
Jefferson v. Target Store Corporation at 205 Mall et al
as 3:2023cv01982
Plaintiff:
Frederick Owen Jefferson
Defendant:
Target Store Corporation at 205 Mall and Kaleb Rethwisch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Velasco v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01976
Petitioner:
Martin Jesus Velasco
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gomez v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01977
Petitioner:
Gabriel Gomez
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martines v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01978
Petitioner:
Jhony Alfredo Martines
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kandt v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01964
Petitioner:
Denny Kandt
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Enciso v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv01965
Petitioner:
Guillermo Galindo Enciso
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
J.B. v. Gray et al
as 3:2023cv01962
Plaintiff:
J.B.
Defendant:
Levi Gray, Jayson Leak, Paul Kizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ayoutt v. Matteucci
as 6:2023cv01966
Plaintiff:
Tristan Ayoutt
Defendant:
Delores Matteucci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Douglas County Jail
as 6:2023cv01968
Plaintiff:
Jared Lee Hawkins
Defendant:
Douglas County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shabazz v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv01961
Plaintiff:
Sheikh Shareef Shabazz
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections and Tasha Petersen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
