US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Social Security Cases
Cases 211 - 220 of 5,536
ANDALIS v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv02000
Plaintiff:
JENNA MARY ANDALIS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Santiago v. Kijakazi,Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv01970
Plaintiff:
BERNADETTE SANTIAGO
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MCCURLEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2023cv01943
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MCCURLEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BRENCHAK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2023cv01939
Plaintiff:
DANIELA BRENCHAK
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
BRANCH v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv01911
Plaintiff:
Carla Branch
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
GORDON v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv01917
Plaintiff:
MIRANDA N GORDON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
REINERT v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv01846
Plaintiff:
ERICA DAWN REINERT
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
EDMOND v. KIJAKAZI
as 5:2023cv01841
Plaintiff:
TAMMY EDMOND
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
LYNCH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv01834
Plaintiff:
COURTNEE MARIE LYNCH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
BOWEN-JABS v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv01839
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE BOWEN-JABS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
