US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Social Security Cases

Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 4,733
KICHLINE v. SAUL
as 5:2020cv02151
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: TASHA KICHLINE
Cause Of Action: Social Security Benefits
STEWART-BROWN v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv02052
Plaintiff: KATHLEEN LOUISE STEWART-BROWN
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
CROSBY v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv02022
Plaintiff: TASHANIQUE NICHOLE CROSBY
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Allen v. Saul
as 2:2020cv02016
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Quentin Allen
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
De Jesus v. Saul
as 5:2020cv01986
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Jos De Jesus
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
RICHBURG v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01957
Plaintiff: CHARLENE RICHBURG
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: Commissioner ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JENNINGS v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01953
Plaintiff: TARRELLE RONALD THOMAS, ANNETTE JENNINGS
Defendant: Commissioner ANDREW M. SAUL, ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
CONNER v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01952
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: SHIRLEY L CONNER
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SWEENEY v. SAUL
as 2:2020cv01912
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: DENA JOAN SWEENEY
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
ZAMORA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2020cv01897
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff: BLANCA ZAMORA
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?