US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Other Statutes Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 807
WHITFIELD v. THE NEW HOME COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03727
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
THE NEW HOME COMPANY, INC., H. LAWRENCE WEBB, WAYNE J STELMAR and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
CICCOTELLI v. CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03708
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
CAI INTERNATIONAL, INC., TIMOTHY B PAGE, KATHRYN G JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Zhou v. Annovis Bio, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03668
Plaintiff:
Guolian Zhou
Defendant:
Annovis Bio, Inc., Maria Maccecchini and Jeffrey McGroarty
JUSTICE, II v. 1LIFE HEALTHCARE, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03612
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D JUSTICE, II
Defendant:
1LIFE HEALTHCARE, INC., AMIR DAN RUBIN, PAUL R AUVIL and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. NET ELEMENT, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03615
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
NET ELEMENT, INC., OLEG FIRER, JON NAJARIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. QTS REALTY TRUST, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03609
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
QTS REALTY TRUST, INC., CHAD WILLIAMS, PHILIP P TRAHANAS and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
HOPKINS v. KINDRED BIOSCIENCES, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03617
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Defendant:
KINDRED BIOSCIENCES, INC., DENISE BEVERS, NANXI LIU and others
HOPKINS v. SYKES ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2021cv03618
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Defendant:
SYKES ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED, MARK BOZEK, JAMES S MACLEOD and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WATERMAN v. SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY COMPANY et al
as 2:2021cv03628
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY COMPANY, CATHERINE A KEHR, JOHN D GASS and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
PAGE v. SHARPSPRING, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv03606
Petitioner:
MARK PAGE
Defendant:
SHARPSPRING, INC., RICK CARLSON, STEVEN HUEY and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
