US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Other Statutes Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 807
CICCOTELLI v. W.R. GRACE & CO. et al
as 2:2021cv02842
Defendant:
DIANE H GULYAS, W.R. GRACE & CO., JULIE FASONE HOLDER and others
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Justice, II v. MACKINAC FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv02844
Defendant:
WALTER J ASPATORE, JOSEPH D GAREA, RANDOLPH C PASCHKE and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D Justice, II
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. KNOLL, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02776
Defendant:
RON KASS, CHRISTOPHER G KENNEDY, ANDREW B COGAN and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
HOPKINS v. PREMIER FINANCIAL BANCORP, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02735
Defendant:
THOMAS W WRIGHT, DOUGLAS V REYNOLDS, TONEY K ADKINS and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. PROOFPOINT, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02733
Defendant:
JONATHAN FEIBER, DANA EVAN, KEVIN HARVEY and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
NICANOR v. OCUGEN, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02725
Defendant:
SANJAY SUBRAMANIAN, SHANKAR MUSUNURI and OCUGEN, INC.
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO NICANOR
WATERMAN v. COHERENT, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02623
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
II-VI INCORPORATED, BEVERLY KAY MATTHEWS, MICHAEL MCMULLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
HOPKINS v. LUMINEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv02618
Defendant:
STEPHEN L ECK, DIJUANA K LEWIS, LUMINEX CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02508
Defendant:
LAURA KAISER, BOB FINOCCHIO, MICHAEL KATZ and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
WHITFIELD v. HOUSTON WIRE & CABLE COMPANY et al
as 2:2021cv02497
Defendant:
JAMES L POKLUDA III, SANFORD W ROTHE, DAVID NIERENBERG and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
