US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 19,426
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. SUN HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00843
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lardizabal et al v. The Vanguard Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01577
Plaintiff:
Aidan Lardizabal and Mayra Alejandra Puentes
Defendant:
THE VANGUARD GROUP INC. and DOES 1 THROUGH 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal--Other Contract
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK et al v. Sams et al
as 2:2024cv01547
Plaintiff:
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK and MAYA K. VAN ROSSUM
Defendant:
Charles F. Sams, III, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
DGU GROUP INC. v. THE INDIVIDUALS, PARTNERSHIPS, AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE "A"
as 2:2023cv02022
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
PATTERSON v. OCUGEN, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01500
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN PATTERSON
Defendant:
OCUGEN, INC., SHANKAR MUSUNURI, SANJAY SUBRAMANIAN and others
THOMAS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv01725
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
