US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Civil Rights Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 220
AL-ARAJ et al v. PANY ENTERPRISES, LP et al
as 2:2007cv02149
Plaintiff:
FAHED AL-ARAJ and PAULINE ANDONIAH
Defendant:
PANY ENTERPRISES, LP, TONY "DOE", IPC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WRIGHT v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv01899
Plaintiff:
GILBERT WRIGHT
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. and CSX RAILROAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BROWN et al v. HORNING FARM AGENCY et al
as 2:2007cv01445
Plaintiff:
GLEN BROWN and FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF SUBURBAN PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
HORNING FARM AGENCY, ALVIN HORNING and SHIRLEY MAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NATIONAL PROPERTIES INC. et al
as 2:2007cv00434
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL PROPERTIES INC., NPI MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, BARRCREST MANOR ASSOCIATES, L.P. and others
Counter Claimant:
NATIONAL PROPERTIES INC., NPI MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and BARRCREST MANOR ASSOCIATES, L.P.
Counter Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY v. PLYMOUTHTOWNE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al
as 2:2006cv04776
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
HOLCOMB ASSOCIATES, INC. v. LEHIGH TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2006cv04014
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
O'DONNELL v. ROSE TREE ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 2:2006cv03601
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
MELMARK, INC. v. EASTTOWN TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2006cv02591
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GAMBONE BROTHERS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY et al
as 2:2006cv01386
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
