US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
DEMARCO et al v. ALEXANDER
as 2:2011cv06444
Plaintiff:
FRANCES T. DEMARCO and LUCIANO M. DEMARCO
Defendant:
GARY D. ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MOSLEY et al v. ALEXANDER
as 2:2011cv02615
Plaintiff:
ROLAND MOSLEY , LINDA MCCOY , CHARLES MORGAN and others
Defendant:
GARY ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
WALTHOUR v. HERRON
as 2:2011cv01690
Plaintiff:
VICTOR WALTHOUR
Defendant:
JON HERRON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. HALEY et al
as 2:2011cv01153
Plaintiff:
TORI BAILEY
Defendant:
LYNDA M. HALEY , CAROL NEVON , JOEL A. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURTON v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2010cv01640
Plaintiff:
JOYCE BURTON
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY and CHARLES LINEAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1437
MICHELFELDER v. MICHELFELDER
as 2:2010cv01409
Plaintiff:
CLARE G. MICHELFELDER
Defendant:
ERWIN D. MICHELFELDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RAFTERY v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE
as 5:2009cv01958
Plaintiff:
PATRICK F. RAFTERY
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
THE ESTATE OF DANIEAL KELLY v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv03700
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF DANIEAL KELLY and THE ESTATE OF DANIEAL KELLY
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES ("DHS") OF THE CITY OF PHILA., MULTI-ETHNIC BEHAVORIAL HEALTH INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DIGIACOMO v. SINGLETON et al
as 2:2008cv00383
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MARSHALL DIGIACOMO
Defendant:
D. SINGLETON, CHOW and D SINGLETON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
