US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Labor Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 402
BRANSON v. SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
as 2:2023cv01404
Plaintiff:
John Branson
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
WHITE v. HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2023cv00732
Plaintiff:
APRIL WHITE
Defendant:
HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
WALKER v. CHESTER COUNTY POCOPSON HOME
as 2:2023cv00687
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY WALKER
Defendant:
CHESTER COUNTY POCOPSON HOME and COUNTY OF CHESTER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
DABNEY v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
as 2:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
SARINA DABNEY
Defendant:
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
LARKE III v. TASTY BAKING COMPANY
as 2:2022cv05114
Plaintiff:
LUCIUS LARKE III
Defendant:
TASTY BAKING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
STOLL v. ARMSTRONG FLOORING, INC.
as 5:2022cv04414
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA K STOLL
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG FLOORING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
SELBY v. SIMITREE ACQUISITION LLC
as 2:2022cv04011
Plaintiff:
FATIMAH SELBY
Defendant:
SIMITREE ACQUISITION LLC
WALLS v. MILLER EDGE, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv03596
Plaintiff:
MR. MARK WALL
Defendant:
MILLER EDGE, INC., MR. JOHN CAGGIANO and MR. TIM CASTELLO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
SHARKOSKI v. VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2022cv03321
Plaintiff:
BRIAN SHARKOSKI
Defendant:
VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
