Middle District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 5,525
Chu v. Perdue
as 3:2016cv01470
Petitioner: Robert Chu
Respondent: Russell Perdue
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fransen v. Tice et al
as 3:2016cv01451
Petitioner: Lennard P. Fransen
Respondent: Eric Tice, PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hargrove v. Parole Board et al
as 3:2016cv01413
Petitioner: Raymond Hargrove
Respondent: Parole Board, Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortega v. Simandle
as 1:2016cv01402
Petitioner: Girson J. Ortega
Respondent: Jerome B. Simandle
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Milhouse v. Ebbert
as 1:2016cv01348
Petitioner: Kareem Hassan Milhouse
Respondent: David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Commonwealth of PA et al
as 3:2016cv01351
Petitioner: Jovan Jones
Respondent: Commonwealth of PA, PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steele v. Linhardt et al
as 3:2016cv01341
Petitioner: Dennis R Steele
Respondent: Eric R. Linhardt, The Court of Common Pleas of Lycoming County, Pennsylvania, PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Warden, USP Lee County
as 1:2016cv01322
Petitioner: Steven A. Johnson
Respondent: Warden, USP Lee County
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moneyham v. Ebbert
as 3:2016cv01311
Petitioner: Anthony Moneyham
Respondent: David J Ebbert
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Benchoff v. Harry et al
as 3:2016cv01312
Petitioner: Robert Benchoff
Respondent: Laurel Harry, PA Board of Probation and Parole, Attorney General of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?