U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Labor Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 173
Elswick v. Bemis Company, Inc.
as 3:2007cv02049
Plaintiff:
John Elswick
Defendant:
Bemis Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
McDannell v. Thos. Somerville Company
as 1:2007cv01821
Plaintiff:
Kenneth McDannell
Defendant:
Thos. Somerville Company, Thos. Somerville Company and Thos. Somerville Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Bentley v. WHTM-TV, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00889
Plaintiff:
Patricia Ann Bentley
Defendant:
WHTM-TV, Inc., Harrisburg Television, Inc. and Allbritton Communications Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Reid v. DDP Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2007cv00615
Plaintiff:
Debra K. Reid
Defendant:
DDP Holdings, Inc., Ideal Merchandising, Inc., Ideal Merchandising & Services and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Lutfy v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00275
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lutfy, Gregory Lutfy, Gregory Lutfy and others
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Sterenchock v. Deangelo Brothers, Inc.
as 3:2006cv01718
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Holmes v. C & S Wholesale Grovers, Inc.
as 1:2006cv01611
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Hudzik v. Vistakon
as 3:2006cv01425
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hargrove v. Bosch Security Systems, Inc.
as 3:2006cv00909
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Latchaw v. TempStar Staffing
as 1:2006cv00872
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
