US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 1,006
BOWERS v. GRAY MATTER SYSTEMS, LLC.
as 2:2021cv00672
Plaintiff:
ERIC LEE BOWERS
Defendant:
GRAY MATTER SYSTEMS, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
ZPE LICENSING INC. v. SNYDER PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00591
Defendant:
SNYDER PERFORMANCE ENGINEERING, INC. doing business as SPE MOTORSPORTS, DAN SNYDER and SCOTT SNYDER
Plaintiff:
ZPE LICENSING INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
BAUSCH HEALTH IRELAND LIMITED et al v. MYLAN LABORATORIES LTD et al
as 2:2021cv00573
Plaintiff:
BAUSCH HEALTH IRELAND LIMITED and SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC
Defendant:
AGILA SPECIALTIES INC, MYLAN INC, VIATRIS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
MONEYTREE, INC. v. YOUR PRIVATE MONEYTREE, LLC
as 2:2021cv00509
Defendant:
YOUR PRIVATE MONEYTREE, LLC
Plaintiff:
MONEYTREE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
BOUND2B B.V. v. XOLUTION, GMBH
as 2:2021cv00476
Defendant:
XOLUTION, GMBH
Plaintiff:
BOUND2B B.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
FAIR SHAKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEGAL SERVICES v. FAIRSHAKE, INC.
as 2:2021cv00362
Plaintiff:
FAIR SHAKE ENVIRONMENTAL LEGAL SERVICES
Defendant:
FAIRSHAKE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
GENERAL NUTRITION INVESTMENT COMPANY et al v. ROYAL PANGA, INC.
as 2:2021cv00299
Plaintiff:
GNC HOLDINGS, INC. and GENERAL NUTRITION INVESTMENT COMPANY
Defendant:
ROYAL PANGA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
FUGAZZI v. CAROTHERS
as 2:2021cv00277
Defendant:
ATTORNEY FLOYDE B. CAROTHERS
Plaintiff:
JOAN C. FUGAZZI
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
EYENAVISION, INC. v. ENCHROMA, INC.
as 2:2021cv00246
Defendant:
ENCHROMA, INC.
Plaintiff:
EYENAVISION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
GAMECHANGER MEDIA, INC. v. SPORTS REFERENCE, LLC
as 2:2021cv00128
Plaintiff:
GAMECHANGER MEDIA, INC.
Defendant:
SPORTS REFERENCE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
