US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Other Statutes Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 5,389
ORDER REGARDING CERTAIN DOCKET MATTERS AND TRANSFERRING/REFERRING CERTAIN PROCEEDINGS
as 2:2023mc00622
ESTES EXPRESS LINES v. U.S.A. LAMP AND BALLAST RECYCLING, INC.
as 2:2023cv01228
Plaintiff:
ESTES EXPRESS LINES
Defendant:
U.S.A. LAMP AND BALLAST RECYCLING, INC. doing business as CLEANLITES RECYCLING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
REDD v. HERITAGE VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.
as 2:2023cv01212
Plaintiff:
ERIKA REDD
Defendant:
HERITAGE VALLEY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
NORTH AMERICAN DENTAL MANAGEMENT, LLC v. PHILLIPS
as 2:2023cv01202
Plaintiff:
NORTH AMERICAN DENTAL MANAGEMENT, LLC
Defendant:
MICHELE PHILLIPS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
W. v. ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK
as 2:2023cv01163
Plaintiff:
W. W.
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
NYAMEKYE v. GARLAND et al
as 3:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
NATHANAEL M. NYAMEKYE
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND and ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
WILLIAMS v. PROMEDICA HEALTH SYSTEMS INC.
as 2:2023cv01134
Plaintiff:
DARRELL E. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
PROMEDICA HEALTH SYSTEMS INC. trading and doing business as PROMEDICA SKLLED NURSING AND REHABILITATION (GREENTREE) trading and doing business as MANORCARE HEALTH SERVICES-GREENTREE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.