US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Other Statutes Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 5,359
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC, RESPIRONICS CALIFORNIA LLC, PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC. and others
CLIFFORD FISCHER & COMPANY v. STARR
as 2:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD FISCHER & COMPANY
Defendant:
CURT STARR
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. MARAPOSA SURGICAL, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00010
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
JUMBA BAKER et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
COLLEEN JUMBA BAKER, BRITTANY MERCER, MATTHEW O'BRIEN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH and MATTHEW LACKNER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
MCMASTERS v. RESTAURANT BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00791
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
TAYLOR v. SUNSEA ENERGY LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
MARIBETH TAYLOR
Defendant:
SUNSEA ENERGY LLC, SUNSEA ENERGY NJ, LLC, SUNSEA ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
ARONSON v. SAVINGS BANK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF MASSACHUSETTS, et al.
as 2:2024cv00355
Defendant:
SAVINGS BANK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF MASSACHUSETTS and SBLI
Plaintiff:
MARK B. ARONSON
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
MIRTTI v. MIRTTI
as 1:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
TUOMAS KRISTIAN MIRTTI
Defendant:
KRISTINA ELIZABETH MIRTTI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
IN THE MATTER OF THE EXTRADITION OF EDWIN ECHAVARRIA
as 2:2023mc00747
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
