District of Pennsylvania Other Statutes Cases

Other Statutory Actions Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 7,687
LOPES PEREIRA v. DE ANDRADE
as 2:2017cv05554
Petitioner: POLIANE LOPES PEREIRA
Respondent: JORCELI PEDRO DE ANDRADE
Cause Of Action: (b) Int'l. Child Abduction in Remedies Act (ICARA)
Simms v. NTL Recovery Agency
as 4:2017cv02277
Plaintiff: James Simms
Defendant: NTL Recovery Agency
Cause Of Action: Fair Credit Reporting Act
DISABILITY RIGHTS PENNSYLVANIA v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
as 2:2017cv05493
Plaintiff: DISABILITY RIGHTS PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
HOTCHKISS v. TRANS UNION, LLC
as 2:2017cv05502
Plaintiff: ELIZABETH HOTCHKISS
Defendant: TRANS UNION, LLC
Cause Of Action: Fair Credit Reporting Act
HERAEUS MEDICAL GMBH v. ZIMMER BIOMET HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv05482
Plaintiff: HERAEUS MEDICAL GMBH
Defendant: ZIMMER BIOMET HOLDINGS, INC., BIOMET, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Other Contract
Charles v. United States Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2017cv02250
Plaintiff: Michael Charles
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: Freedom of Information Act
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON v. MAZZA et al
as 2:2017cv05453
Defendant: MARK D. MAZZA, LISA A. MAZZA
Plaintiff: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
Cause Of Action: Notice of Removal
FOLINO v. DOES 1-13
as 2:2017cv01584
Plaintiff: JOHN FOLINO
Defendant: JOHN DOES 1-13
Cause Of Action: Personal Property: Fraud
HOBBS v. MEDICAL GUARDIAN LLC et al
as 2:2017cv05462
Plaintiff: KEITH HOBBS
Defendant: MEDICAL GUARDIAN LLC
Cause Of Action: (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
PDC MACHINES INC. v. NEL HYDROGEN A/S et al
as 2:2017cv05399
Plaintiff: PDC MACHINES INC.
Defendant: NEL HYDROGEN A/S, JOSHUA ANDREW ADAMS
Cause Of Action: Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?