US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 2,604
De-Aza-Casillas v. USA
as 3:2022cv01398
Petitioner:
Adlay De-Aza-Casillas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bello-Rodriguez v. USA
as 3:2022cv01406
Petitioner:
Joel Bello-Rodriguez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Velazquez-Aponte v. USA
as 3:2022cv01382
Petitioner:
Carmelo Velazquez-Aponte
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Benitez-Serrano v. USA
as 3:2022cv01384
Petitioner:
Luis A. Benitez-Serrano
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Flores-Moret v. Warden Institucion Bayamon 501
as 3:2022cv01377
Plaintiff:
Tomas Flores-Moret
Defendant:
Warden Institucion Bayamon 501
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres-Coss v. USA
as 3:2022cv01381
Petitioner:
Jesus Torres-Coss
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Martinez-Machuca v. USA
as 3:2022cv01372
Petitioner:
Jean Carlos Martinez-Machuca
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sosa-Tufino v. Warden MDC Guaynabo
as 3:2022cv01364
Plaintiff:
Marco Santiago Sosa-Tufino
Defendant:
Warden MDC Guaynabo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Skerret-Hernandez v. Gonzalez-Ramos
as 3:2022cv01366
Plaintiff:
Omar Skerret-Hernandez
Defendant:
Edwin O. Gonzalez-Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez-Lopez v. Metropolitan Detention Center Guaynabo
as 3:2022cv01363
Plaintiff:
Freddy Daniel Lopez-Lopez
Defendant:
Metropolitan Detention Center Guaynabo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
