Puerto Rico Social Security Cases
Cases 251 - 260 of 1,352
Torres v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv02003
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Miguel A Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Rodriguez-Diaz v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv02009
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Carmen Milagros Rodriguez-Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Bellido-Benejan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv01994
Plaintiff:
Maria D. Bellido-Benejan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Marti-Feliciano v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv01981
Plaintiff:
Edgar Marti-Feliciano
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Brindle-Estrella v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv01983
Plaintiff:
Janet Brindle-Estrella
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Cruz-Guzman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv01974
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Antonio Jose Cruz-Guzman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Pena-Maldonado v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv01971
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jose Guillermo Pena-Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Dominicci-Lucca v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv01969
Plaintiff:
R Alvaro Dominicci-Lucca and Alvaro R. Dominicci-Lucca
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ortiz-Beltran v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv01958
Plaintiff:
Wanda Ivelisse Ortiz-Beltran
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Flores-Mercado v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv01959
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Carmen G Flores-Mercado and Carmen G. Flores-Mercado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
