Puerto Rico Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 2,612
Romero-Figueroa v. Gonzalez-Ramos et al
as 3:2022cv01131
Petitioner:
Celso Romero-Figueroa
Respondent:
Edwin O. Gonzalez-Ramos and Domingo Emanuelli-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Correa-Figueroa v. USA
as 3:2022cv01132
Petitioner:
Luis Javier Correa-Figueroa
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Alexander v. USA
as 3:2022cv01119
Petitioner:
Ray L. Alexander
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rivera-Calcano v. USA
as 3:2022cv01110
Petitioner:
Miguel Rivera-Calcano
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jurado-Nazario v. USA
as 3:2022cv01114
Petitioner:
Edwin Jurado-Nazario
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Falu-Diaz v. USA
as 3:2022cv01120
Petitioner:
Roger Falu-Diaz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Muller-Colon v. USA
as 3:2022cv01121
Petitioner:
Walter D. Muller-Colon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rivera-Ortiz v. USA
as 3:2022cv01115
Petitioner:
Ricardo Rivera-Ortiz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gonzalez-Garcia v. Superintendent
as 3:2022cv01086
Plaintiff:
Michael Gonzalez-Garcia and Superintendent Institucion Correcional Maxima Seguridad Guayama 1000
Respondent:
Superintendent Institucion Correccional Maxima Seguridad Guayama 1000
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Encarnacion-Nieves v. USA
as 3:2022cv01081
Petitioner:
Samuel Encarnacion-Nieves
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
