US District Court for the District of Rhode Island Real Property Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 93
Vera v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01962
Plaintiff:
Ana Maria Vera
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barnes v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01956
Plaintiff:
Alice Marie Barnes
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gayvont v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01966
Plaintiff:
Brenda Gayvont
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Corley v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01951
Plaintiff:
Vicki L. Corley
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shafer v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01961
Plaintiff:
Sharon A. Shafer
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Girton v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01949
Plaintiff:
Joseph Girton, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mueller v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01947
Plaintiff:
Kori Mueller
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stewart et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01954
Plaintiff:
Wrennette Stewart and Philli Stewart, Sr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Waycaster v. C.R. Bard, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01948
Plaintiff:
Sandra Waycaster
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc, Davol, Inc and Bard Medical Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garcia v. Davol, Inc et al
as 1:2007cv01955
Plaintiff:
Catalina Garcia
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
