Rhode Island Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 95
Spearman v. Travis & Natalie, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00522
Plaintiff:
Joshua Spearman
Defendant:
Travis & Natalie, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Nevor v. Moneypenny Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00407
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Nevor
Defendant:
Moneypenny Holdings, LLC and James R. Swartz
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Makarevic v. Karen Sue, Incorporated
as 1:2013cv00019
Plaintiff:
Victor Makarevic
Defendant:
Karen Sue, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Adventure Sailing Charters, LLC v. Smithers Alfred et al
as 1:2011cv00248
Plaintiff:
Adventure Sailing Charters, LLC
Defendant:
Alfred Smithers and S/Y La Forza Del Destino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Causgrove v. Interstate Navigation Company
as 1:2011cv00242
Plaintiff:
Shawn Causgrove
Defendant:
Interstate Navigation Company and Master of the Block Island Ferry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Continental Casualty Company v. Ocean Options, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00500
Plaintiff:
Continental Casualty Company
Defendant:
Ocean Options, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Nguyen v. Salt Pond Fisheries, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00411
Plaintiff:
Long Nguyen
Defendant:
Salt Pond Fisheries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Marsan v. Block Island Parasail, Inc et al
as 1:2010cv00331
Plaintiff:
Meghan Marsan
Defendant:
Block Island Parasail, Inc and Robert Littlefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flesia v. Loftes Fisheries
as 1:2009cv00210
Plaintiff:
Joseph Flesia
Defendant:
Loftes Fisheries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Miller v. American Canadian Caribbean Line, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00151
Plaintiff:
Carol Miller and Carol Miller
Defendant:
American Canadian Caribbean Line, Inc., American Canadian Caribbean Line, Inc., American Canadian Caribbean Line, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
