South Carolina Labor Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 194
Kiawah Management Group LLC v. Anderson
as 2:2016cv01980
Plaintiff:
Kiawah Management Group LLC
Defendant:
William Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Patterson v. Asbury SC Lex LLC
as 6:2016cv01666
Plaintiff:
Daniel Patterson
Defendant:
Asbury SC Lex LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Barnett v. Diversified Computer Solutions Inc
as 3:2016cv01199
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Barnett
Defendant:
Diversified Computer Solutions Inc
Counter_claimant:
Diversified Computer Solutions Inc
Counter_defendant:
Thomas E Barnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Catoe v. PHC Rehab Inc
as 2:2016cv00913
Plaintiff:
Mary Catoe
Defendant:
PHC Rehab Inc
Counter_claimant:
PHC Rehab Inc
Counter_defendant:
Mary Catoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Folk v. SC Healthcare Investments, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00643
Plaintiff:
Megan Folk
Defendant:
SC Healthcare Investments Managing Member, LLC and SC Healthcare Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101 WARN Act
Brooks v. Technical College of the Lowcountry
as 9:2015cv05072
Plaintiff:
Patricia L Brooks
Defendant:
Technical College of the Lowcountry
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Kohler v. Bi-Lo LLC
as 4:2015cv04641
Plaintiff:
James Edward Kohler
Defendant:
Bi-Lo LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lunn v. Flower
as 1:2015cv04454
Plaintiff:
Martin Lunn
Defendant:
Mike Flower
Counter_claimant:
Mike Flower
Counter_defendant:
Martin Lunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marshall v. Cardinal Health 200, LLC
as 0:2015cv04407
Plaintiff:
Odessa Marshall
Defendant:
Cardinal Health 200, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Mack et al v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee Inc
as 8:2015cv03247
Plaintiff:
Allen Mack and Mark Powell
Defendant:
Fred's Stores of Tennessee Inc
Counter_claimant:
Fred's Stores of Tennessee Inc
Counter_defendant:
Allen Mack and Mark Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
