US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 1,399
Drinnon et al v. Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. et al (TV2)
as 2:2021cv00177
Plaintiff:
Lynn E Drinnon, Hazel Drinnon and Lynn E. Drinnon
Defendant:
Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc., Bodycote USA, Inc. and Bodycote Morristown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Powell v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00278
Plaintiff:
Sandra Powell
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc., Walmart, Inc., d/b/a Sam's East, Inc., Walmart, Inc., d/b/a Sam's Club and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnold v. Forward Air Corporation
as 2:2021cv00170
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Arnold
Defendant:
Forward Air Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bilal v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 1:2021cv00266
Plaintiff:
Amran Bilal
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Walmart Supercenter #3659
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fleenor v. O'Donnell
as 2:2021cv00158
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Dawn Fleenor
Defendant:
Bethany O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 247
Johnson v. Corporation Service Company (JRG2)
as 3:2021cv00354
Plaintiff:
Tequila Johnson
Defendant:
Family Dollar and Corporation Service Company doing business as Family Dollar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
White v. Yother et al
as 1:2021cv00252
Plaintiff:
Roman Teague White
Defendant:
Mark Yother and Landon Pence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White v. Yother et al
as 4:2021cv00045
Plaintiff:
Roman Teague White
Defendant:
Mark Yother and Landon Pence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Horton v. Ripley Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00350
Plaintiff:
Debra Horton
Defendant:
Ripley Entertainment, Inc. and Five Oaks Development Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilson v. Rebecca's Transport, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00242
Plaintiff:
James Wilson
Defendant:
Rebecca's Transport, LLC and Chad Teague
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
