US District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 221 - 230 of 1,396
Lane v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00043
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Ann Lane
Defendant:
American Multi-Cinema, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lowe et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 4:2021cv00009
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Plaintiff:
Paul Lowe and Lauren Lowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilliam v. Medtronic, Inc. (JRG3)
as 4:2021cv00007
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Randy David Gilliam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kiser v. United States of America, et al
as 2:2021cv00040
Plaintiff:
Jeffery A Kiser
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc., United States of America, Drug Enforcement Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Odom v. Walmart, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00060
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Plaintiff:
Christy L. Odom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cross v. ARP-GOLD-64 Bypass at Durkee Road LLC (TV2)
as 3:2021cv00048
Defendant:
Sullivan Painting, Inc., RI TN 2, LLC. d/b/a Circle K Store, ARP-GOLD-64 Bypass at Durkee Road LLC d/b/a Circle K Store and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Family Dollar Stores of Tennessee, Inc. (TV1)
as 3:2021cv00035
Plaintiff:
Judy R. King
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Ciftci v. Knox County et al (TV2)
as 3:2021cv00033
Defendant:
Tom Spangler, Christopher F Wallace, Brandon Workman and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Arin Ciftci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephens et al v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
as 4:2021cv00003
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I
Plaintiff:
Arthur Stephens and Geraldine Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rainsford v. Apex Bank
as 3:2021cv00025
Plaintiff:
Bettis C Rainsford, Sr
Defendant:
Apex Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
