US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 317
Carsmart, LLC v. Lawson Autos, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00251
Plaintiff:
Carsmart, LLC
Defendant:
Lawson Autos, LLC and Leonard Lawson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Church v. Various John Does et al
as 3:2015cv00229
Plaintiff:
Eric Church
Defendant:
Various John Does, Various Jane Does and Various XYZ Corporations
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The Nutro Company v. Merrick Pet Care, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00146
Plaintiff:
The Nutro Company
Defendant:
Merrick Pet Care, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Healthways, Inc. v. Healtheway, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00104
Plaintiff:
Healthways, Inc.
Defendant:
Healtheway, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Millar v. Urban Outfitters, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00088
Plaintiff:
Jay Millar
Defendant:
Urban Outfitters, Inc., Hot Topic Tennessee, Inc., Hot Topic, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Music City Metals Co., Inc. v. Hua et al
as 3:2015cv00067
Plaintiff:
Music City Metals Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Xiao Jin Hua, Hou Huanqing, King Shin International and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Embers Grill & Fireplace Store, LLC v. Embers Ski Lodge, LLC
as 3:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
Embers Grill & Fireplace Store, LLC
Defendant:
Embers Ski Lodge, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bridgestone Brands, LLC et al v. OTR Wheel Engineering, Inc.
as 3:2014cv02402
Plaintiff:
Bridgestone Brands, LLC and Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC
Defendant:
OTR Wheel Engineering, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Murphy v. Soundvision Technologies, LLC
as 3:2014cv02357
Plaintiff:
John L. Murphy
Defendant:
Soundvision Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Christian v. Kensington Publishing Corp.
as 3:2014cv02301
Plaintiff:
Charles Christian
Defendant:
Kensington Publishing Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
