US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Labor Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 162
Davis v. Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC
as 3:2014cv00128
Plaintiff:
Susan T. Davis
Defendant:
Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Cummins v. Home Health Services of the Upper Cumberlands, LLC
as 2:2014cv00002
Plaintiff:
Sandra M. Cummins
Defendant:
Home Health Services of the Upper Cumberlands, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Lunsford v. Mid-South Waffles, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01269
Plaintiff:
Robert Lunsford
Defendant:
Mid-South Waffles, Inc. and Waffle House, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ball v. Community Health Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01129
Plaintiff:
Theda Rusch Ball
Defendant:
Community Health Systems, Inc., Lexington Home Care Services, LLC, Community Health Systems Professional Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Petty v. Jennings Tire Company
as 3:2013cv01040
Plaintiff:
Michael Petty
Defendant:
Jennings Tire Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morton v. Vanderbilt
as 3:2013cv01012
Plaintiff:
Tracy Morton
Defendant:
Vanderbilt University
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
Brown v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 3:2013cv00983
Plaintiff:
Ricky Allen Brown
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Melton v. The Vanderbilt University
as 3:2013cv00825
Plaintiff:
Sherry Melton
Defendant:
The Vanderbilt University
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Cantrell v. R.E. West, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00458
Plaintiff:
Douglas Cantrell
Defendant:
R.E. West, Inc. and Bob West
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Ingram v. State of Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development et al
as 3:2012cv01106
Plaintiff:
Donald B. Ingram
Defendant:
State of Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development and Karla Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
