US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee Prisoner Petitions Cases

Civil Rights Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,700
Johnson v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2021cv02650
Plaintiff: Wilbur T Johnson
Defendant: Shelby County, Tennessee, SGT David Dyson, SGT Lawrence Parrish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Shelby County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2021cv02648
Plaintiff: Wilbur T Johnson
Defendant: Shelby County, Tennessee, David Dyson, Lawrence Parrish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
v. Johnson et al
as 2:2021cv02647
Defendant: Wilbur T Johnson, Shelby County,Tennessee, David Dyson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bufford v. Mehr et al
as 1:2021cv01153
Plaintiff: De'Andre Bufford
Defendant: Sheriff John Mehr and Mayor Scott Conger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. White et al
as 1:2021cv01149
Plaintiff: Albert Jones
Defendant: S. White and Eric Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrison v. Balderrama et al
as 1:2021cv01147
Plaintiff: Elijah Ismail Muhammad Garrison
Defendant: Lisa Balderrama and Madison County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boykin v. Mehr et al
as 1:2021cv01144
Plaintiff: Aaron Z. Boykin
Defendant: John Mehr, Scott Conger and Madison County Government Officials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeves v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2021cv01143
Plaintiff: Octaivian Demetrius Reeves
Defendant: State of Tennessee, Al Earls, Judge Roger Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Mehr et al
as 1:2021cv01141
Plaintiff: Blake Carroll
Defendant: John Mehr, Scott Conger and Madison County Government Official
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beasley v. Mehr et al
as 1:2021cv01134
Plaintiff: Vantedeius Beasley
Defendant: John Mehr, Scott Conger and Madison County Government Officials
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?