Tennessee Social Security Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 167
Caccamisi v. Astrue
as 2:2008cv02102
Petitioner:
Joseph Caccamisi and Joseph Caccamisi
Respondent:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Kilgore v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 4:2008cv00020
Plaintiff:
Larry M Kilgore
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Hampton v. Astrue
as 2:2008cv02098
Plaintiff:
Tommie F. Hampton and Tommie F. Hampton
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lemons v. Astrue
as 2:2007cv02844
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lemons and Melvin Lemons
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Potts v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2007cv01284
Plaintiff:
Dallas K. Potts
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Roberts v. Astrue
as 2:2007cv02756
Plaintiff:
George Roberts and George Roberts
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Owens v. Social Security Administration et al
as 2:2007cv00069
Plaintiff:
Martha E. Miracle Owens
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Tayip v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2007cv00989
Plaintiff:
Ayshe Tayip
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Wright v. Astrue
as 2:2007cv02594
Plaintiff:
Keitha Tammy Wright
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Brooks v. Astrue
as 2:2007cv02551
Appellant:
Loretta M Brooks and Loretta M Brooks
Appellee:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
