Tennessee Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 464
Ellis v. Firsthand Health Inc.
as 2:2024cv02913
Plaintiff:
Devin Ellis
Defendant:
Firsthand Health Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Hurst v. First Peoples Bank of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Felicia Hurst
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Jones v. CraneTech, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00397
Defendant:
Claiborne Hauling, LLC, Brad Jacobs, Eric Factor and others
Plaintiff:
Charles E Jones, Jr
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Pointer v. Harris et al
as 3:2024cv01127
Defendant:
Tammie Harris, Leroy Haynes and C.W. Services
Plaintiff:
Johnny Pointer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Laboy v. Technical Response, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00368
Defendant:
Technical Response, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Harley Laboy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Pearson v. Chas. C. Parks Company
as 3:2024cv01028
Defendant:
Chas. C. Parks Company doing business as Charlie C. Parks Co.
Plaintiff:
Larry Pearson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101 Worker Adjustment/Retraining Notification Act
Milan v. Microvast, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00627
Defendant:
Microvast Holdings, Inc. and Microvast, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Deidra Milan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101 Worker Adjustment/Retraining Notification Act
ANDUJAR et al v. HUB GROUP TRUCKING, INC.
as 2:2024cv02296
Plaintiff:
JORGE ANDUJAR and FRANKLIN PENA BATISTA
Defendant:
Hub Group Trucking Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Carlyle v. Stryker Employment Company, LLC
as 2:2024cv02226
Plaintiff:
John Carlyle
Defendant:
Stryker Employment Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Hodge v. White et al
as 2:2024cv02179
Plaintiff:
James Albert Hodge
Defendant:
Quin White and New Era Transport, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
