US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Real Property Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 77
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Assoc v. Parms
as 4:2010cv00651
Defendant:
Ronald Parms
Plaintiff:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Assoc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Pasha
as 4:2010cv00430
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Sajida Pasha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bank of America, N.A. v. Voth
as 4:2010cv00344
Plaintiff:
Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant:
Soka Voth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US Bank National Association v. Sotelo
as 4:2010cv00334
Plaintiff:
US Bank National Association
Defendant:
Rolando Sotelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bank of New York Mellon formely known as The Bank of New York as Trusee for the Certificateholders CWABS Inc Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2004-6 the v. Nguyen
as 4:2010cv00283
Defendant:
Trieu Van Nguyen
Plaintiff:
Bank of New York Mellon the
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Hicks
as 4:2010cv00270
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Defendant:
Darryl E. Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Gordon et al
as 4:2010cv00265
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Maurice A. Gordon, Sr. and Sonya L. Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Delagarza v. Jones
as 4:2010cv00230
Plaintiff:
James Delagarza
Defendant:
Todd Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Castle Hills Property Company v. CAPX Realty, LLC et al
as 4:2010cv00006
Plaintiff:
Castle Hills Property Company
Defendant:
CAPX Realty, LLC and Eagle Golf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity: Forcible Detainer
CAPX Realty, LLC v. Castle Hills Development Corp.
as 4:2009cv00592
Plaintiff:
CAPX Realty, LLC
Defendant:
Castle Hills Development Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.