US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 11,015
Busby v. State of Texas
as 4:2024cv02133
Plaintiff:
Wyatt Busby
Defendant:
State Of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arellano v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02116
Petitioner:
Wilberto Arellano
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gallardo v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02158
Petitioner:
Joe Gallardo
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simpson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02126
Petitioner:
James Burchard Simpson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00074
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Jorge Alberto Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans Jr. v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01950
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Evans Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salinas v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01917
Petitioner:
John Thomas Salinas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01897
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Darren Tramell Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gutierrez v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv01902
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Leonardo Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Shepard v. Brazos County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2024cv01913
Petitioner:
Tyrone Radale Shepard
Respondent:
Wayne Dicky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
