US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 27,299
Clarke v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01205
Petitioner:
James David Clarke, Jr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jones v. Methodist Hospital et al
as 4:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
James H Jones
Defendant:
Methodist Hospital, District Attorney's Office, Roy Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Bryan Collier et al
as 4:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Marvin Young
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Amber K. Ochoa, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spicer v. Harris County et al
as 4:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Elton Spicer
Defendant:
Harris County, John Vickers, Andrew Pena and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Giagnacovo v. Gonzalez
as 4:2024cv01162
Petitioner:
Hector Giagnacovo
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Warden, FCI Three Rivers
as 2:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Nevon Barnes
Defendant:
Warden FCI Three Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perry v. John B. Holmes et al
as 4:2024cv01151
Plaintiff:
Gerald Allen Perry
Defendant:
John B. Holmes, Ken R. Williamson, Boyd Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ghose v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00085
Petitioner:
Sayantan Ghose
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ghose v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Sayantan (SY) Ghose
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
