US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 695
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv02964
Defendant:
AFGE Local #1633
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Weston et al v. AFGE et al
as 4:2024cv02965
Defendant:
Daphne Jackson, Local #1633 AFGE, Michael A King and others
Plaintiff:
Sheila Butler, Marielle Weston, Clara Achilefu and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act
Rodriguez v. Walgreen Co.
as 2:2024cv00150
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Rodriguez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Richards v. Exxon Mobile et al
as 4:2024cv02422
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil, A Corporation, Aaron Pina and Danny Long
Plaintiff:
Christopher Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Moore v. Harris County
as 4:2024cv02185
Plaintiff:
AARON MOORE
Defendant:
HARRIS COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Sanchez et al v. City of Corpus Christi, Texas
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Teofilo Sanchez, Amanda Guerra, Cody Scott and others
Defendant:
City of Corpus Christi, Texas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Bryant v. Texas City ISD
as 3:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Larry Bryant
Defendant:
Texas City ISD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaskett v. Pemex Incorporated et al
as 4:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
Ronald Augustine Plaskett
Defendant:
Pemex Incorporated and Shell LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Diffa v. Daikin Comfort Technologies Manufacturing L.P.
as 4:2024cv01377
Plaintiff:
Weniboebi Diffa
Defendant:
DAIKIN COMFORT TECHNOLOGIES, MANUFACTURING L.P. and Daikin Comfort Technologies Manufacturing L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Keen v. Onpoint Industrial Services
as 3:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Mandy Keen
Defendant:
Onpoint Industrial Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
