U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas Labor Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 714
Hillary v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.

as 7:2023cv00408
Plaintiff:
Steven S Hillary
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Dominguez v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
as 5:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Norma Dominguez
Defendant:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Hayes v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Hayes
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
AmCap Mortgage, Ltd. v. Right Start Mortgage, Inc.
as 4:2023cv04307
Plaintiff:
AmCap Mortgage, Ltd.
Defendant:
Right Start Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Huerta v. City of Kingsville
as 2:2023cv00290
Plaintiff:
Jose H. Huerta
Defendant:
City of Kingsville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Khan v. Slalom LLC
as 4:2023cv03772
Plaintiff:
Umar Khan
Defendant:
Slalom LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ortiz v. AutoZoners LLC
as 7:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Manuel Angel Ortiz
Defendant:
AutoZoners LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Velasco v. IAS Logistics DFW, LLC d/b/a Pinnacle Logistics
as 7:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Analicia Velasco
Defendant:
IAS Logistics DFW, LLC d/b/a Pinnacle Logistics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Theerman v. Veracyte, Inc.
as 4:2023cv03548
Plaintiff:
Lauren Theerman
Defendant:
Veracyte, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.