US District Court for the Western District of Texas Other Statutes Cases
Cases 191 - 200 of 2,255
Williams v. Mazda North American Operations
as 5:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
Minerva Williams
Defendant:
Mazda North American Operations
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Kinard v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
SARAH KINARD
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Turnbull v. Board of Directors of the State Bar of Texas et al
as 1:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Edward Turnbull, IV
Defendant:
Board of Directors of the State Bar of Texas, Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FILING ERROR
as 1:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Denise A Rosales
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Generous Home Care Management, LLC v. Becerra
as 5:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Generous Home Care Management, LLC
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Holzman v. Subaru of America Inc.
as 1:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Sydney Holzman
Defendant:
Subaru of America Inc and Subaru of America Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jaimes et al v. Mazda North American Operations
as 1:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
Pastor Jaimes and Amanda Jaimes
Defendant:
Mazda North American Operations
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
In re: Salesforce, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00174
Petitioner:
Salesforce, Inc.
Respondent:
WSOU Holdings, LLC and WSOU Capital Partners LLC
Pizzolla v. McDonough et al
as 3:2023cv00101
In Re:
Antonio Michetti
Petitioner:
Massimo Pizzolla
Respondent:
Dennis Richard McDonough and Francisco Gonzalez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Venue
Suday v. Lozano Suday
as 2:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Maryvel Suday
Defendant:
Jesus Lozano Suday
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
