Texas Social Security Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 80
Nickerson v. Astrue et al
as 4:2013cv01605
Plaintiff:
Eddie Nickerson
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Social Security Administration (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Blair v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 6:2013cv00345
Plaintiff:
Deborah Blair
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Reddic v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 6:2013cv00346
Plaintiff:
Louisa Demings Reddic
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Juanita Bell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Clark v. Astrue
as 4:2013cv00354
Plaintiff:
Daryl L Clark
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Castillo v. Astrue et al
as 4:2012cv03512
Plaintiff:
Gloria Ann Castillo
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue, Social Security Administration and Social Security Administration (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Nichols v. Social Security Administration Supervision
as 3:2012cv03863
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Nichols
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Armes v. Sebelius
as 3:2012cv00262
Plaintiff:
Jay J. Armes
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Crawford v. Astrue
as 5:2012cv00054
Plaintiff:
Monica Crawford
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Shaver v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv01682
Plaintiff:
Mark S Shaver
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
