US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 151 - 160 of 1,338
Brunswick Corporation v. Volvo Penta Of The Americas, LLC
as 2:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Brunswick Corporation
Defendant:
Volvo Penta Of The Americas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Brunswick Corporation v. Volvo Penta Of The Americas, LLC
as 1:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Brunswick Corporation
Defendant:
Volve Penta of the Americas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Andrew Hirshfeld and Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
DatRec, LLC v. Bitrix, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
DatRec, LLC
Defendant:
Bitrix, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Verna IP Holdings, LLC v. Everbridge, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Verna IP Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Everbridge, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
DatRec, LLC v. AMWELL, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
DatRec, LLC
Defendant:
AMWELL, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Verna IP Holdings, LLC v. Everbridge, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Verna IP Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Everbridge, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
AfterGlow, LLC v. Jessup Manufacturing Company
as 1:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
AfterGlow, LLC
Defendant:
Jessup Manufacturing Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, INC., v. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
as 1:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, INC.,
Defendant:
KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 281 Patent Infringement
CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, INC., v. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
as 2:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, INC.,
Defendant:
KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 281
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
