US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Other Statutes Cases
Cases 251 - 258 of 258
King et al v. Sebelius et al
as 3:2013cv00630
Plaintiff:
David King , Douglas Hurst , Brenda Levy and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius , United States Department of Health and Human Services , Jacob Lew and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Rhode v. Mason, Mason, Walker & Hedrick, P.C. et al
as 4:2013cv00124
Plaintiff:
Damian M. Rohde
Defendant:
Mason, Mason, Walker & Hedrick, P.C. and Enterprise Leasing Co of Norfolk
Cause Of Action: 50 U.S.C. § 0501
Strategy and Management Services, Inc. v. The United States of America
as 3:2013cv00453
Plaintiff:
Strategy and Management Services, Inc.
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Strategy and Management Services, Inc. v. The United States of America
as 1:2013cv00858
Plaintiff:
Strategy and Management Services, Inc.
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Eagle on Alliance et al v. Jewell et al
as 2:2013cv00371
Plaintiff:
Eagle on Alliance and Carol F. Senechal
Defendant:
Sally Jewell, Dan Ashe and Wendi Weber
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 668 Bald Eagle Protection Act
Mentor Graphics Corporation v. Rea
as 1:2013cv00518
Plaintiff:
Mentor Graphics Corporation
Defendant:
Teresa Stanek Rea
Intervenor_defendant:
Synopsys, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jack v. Virginia Employment Commission
as 1:2013cv00350
Plaintiff:
Todd M. Jack
Defendant:
Virginia Employment Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
Versata Development Group, Inc. v. Rea
as 1:2013cv00328
Plaintiff:
Versata Development Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Teresa Stanek Rea
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
