US District Court for the Western District of Virginia Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,454
Lane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Hassie Ann Lane
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thatcher v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Christa Amanda Thatcher
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Baker v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Tamara Dawn Baker
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Siegel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Robin Siegel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mitchell v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Tony Ryan Mitchell
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Haynes v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 7:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Peggy Haynes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Casey v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Junella Casey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Christopher Edward Martin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Chapman v. O'Malley
as 3:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Chapman
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sherman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Sherman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
