US District Court for the Western District of Virginia Real Property Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 311
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 1.43 Acres of Land, Owned by Junior Franklin McBride and Joyce W. McBride, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
1.43 Acres of Land, Owned by Junior Franklin McBride and Joyce W. McBride, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 7.27 Acres of Land, Owned by Earl Joan A. Worsham, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
7.27 Acres of Land, Owned by Earl Joan A. Worsham, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 5.56 Acres of Land, Owned by Franklin Real Estate Company et al
as 7:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
5.56 Acres of Land, Owned by Franklin Real Estate Company and 4.82 Acres of Land, Owned by Franklin Real Estate Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 2.17 Acres of Land, Owned by Kathryn M. Nicholson, Richard Gustavus Motley and Reva A. Motley, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
2.17 Acres of Land, Owned by Kathryn M. Nicholson, Richard Gustavus Motley and Reva A. Motley, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 4.59 Acres of Land, Owned by Melissa Sims Hairston, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
4.59 Acres of Land, Owned by Melissa Sims Hairston, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 19.08 Acres of Land, Owned by Melissa Sims Hairston, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
19.08 Acres of Land, Owned by Melissa Sims Hairston, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 8.24 Acres of Land, Owned by EST Enterprises, LLC, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2021cv00062
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
8.24 Acres of Land, Owned by EST Enterprises, LLC, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 2.36 Acres of Land, Owned by EST Enterprises, LLC, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2021cv00061
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
2.36 Acres of Land, Owned by EST Enterprises, LLC, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.83 Acres of Land, Owned by Brandon A. Collins and Kari T. Collins, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2021cv00063
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
0.83 Acres of Land, Owned by Brandon A. Collins and Kari T. Collins, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.48 Acres of Land, Owned by Shirley B. Baggerly, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2021cv00053
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
0.48 Acres of Land, Owned by Shirley B. Baggerly, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
