Virginia Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 4,468
Magellan Technology, Inc. et al v. Dorbes LLC. et al
as 7:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Magellan Technology, Inc. and Ecto World, LLC. doing business as Demand Vape
Defendant:
Dorbes LLC. and Christian A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Foot Levelers, Inc. v. Maggs
as 7:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Foot Levelers, Inc.
Defendant:
Tim Maggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG et al v. Foras Technologies Ltd.
as 1:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG and Robert Bosch GmbH
Defendant:
Foras Technologies Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC. v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC.
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Doe John
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Strike 3
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
