Virginia Other Statutes Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 240
Smith v. Raytheon Company
as 1:2017cv00438
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Smith
Defendant:
Raytheon Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Remacle v. Repperio, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00434
Plaintiff:
Patricia Remacle
Defendant:
Repperio, Inc., June Marshall, Thomas Ziemba and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Wood et al v. Cole et al
as 2:2017cv00190
Plaintiff:
Deborah Cox Wood and DCW Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Richard T. Cole , Daoud Investment Holdings, Inc. , Wadid Daoud and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rubin v. FRB & Co. et al
as 1:2017cv00410
Plaintiff:
Michael Rubin
Defendant:
FRB & Co., Richard J. Hendrix, Arthur J. Reimers and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ludwig
as 1:2017cv00331
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Christopher Ludwig
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Gordon v. CEB, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00290
Plaintiff:
Michael Gordon
Defendant:
CEB, Inc. , Thomas L. Monahan, III , Gregor S. Bailar and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Buchans v. CEB, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00263
Plaintiff:
Shane Buchans
Defendant:
CEB, Inc. , Thomas L. Monahan, III , Gregor S. Bailar and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Steinberg v. CEB Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00220
Plaintiff:
Chaile Steinberg
Defendant:
CEB Inc., Thomas L. Monahan, III, Gregor S. Bailar and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Chopp v. Genworth Financial, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00157
Plaintiff:
Esther Chopp
Defendant:
Genworth Financial, Inc. , William H. Bolinder , G. Kent Conrad and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Karroum et al
as 1:2017cv00187
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Steve H. Karroum, FX & Beyond Corporation and Sahar Karroum
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
