Virginia Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 307
Pauper v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 1:2025cv00476
Plaintiff:
Margaret A Pauper
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Toner et al v. AMP United, L.L.C.
as 2:2025cv00122
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Toner and Frederick Morton Wilson
Defendant:
AMP United, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101 Workers Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act
Redd v. Hollandsworth
as 1:2025cv00373
Petitioner:
Phelicea M. Redd
Respondent:
Brian L. Hollandsworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Haley v. City Of Danville
as 4:2025cv00006
Plaintiff:
Philip Andrew Haley
Defendant:
City Of Danville
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Callis v. Leidos, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00902
Plaintiff:
Raven Callis
Defendant:
Leidos, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Haskin v. General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00720
Defendant:
General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc., Sr. Production Manag Dave Chappel, Production Manager Thomas Ricapito and others
Plaintiff:
Tyree Haskin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
McCoy v. Harris Teeter, LLC
as 2:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Sandra McCoy
Defendant:
Harris Teeter, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Hersi v. Healthicity, LLC
as 1:2024cv02025
Defendant:
Healthicity, LLC
Plaintiff:
Mustafa A. Hersi
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Scott v. Pulaski Medical, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv00771
Defendant:
Pulaski Medical, LLC and Pinnacle Treatment Centers, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Sue Williams Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Rakes v. Hanes Brands, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00040
Defendant:
Hanes Brands, Inc. and APEX Mills
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Rakes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
