U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,382
Head v. Bisignano
as 1:2025cv03108
Plaintiff:
Jenna Head
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Priser v. Bisignano
as 4:2025cv05083
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Priser
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shipley v. Bisignano
as 1:2025cv03103
Plaintiff:
Bonnie M Shipley
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Catron v. Bisignano
as 1:2025cv03101
Plaintiff:
Deborah Jane Catron
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Collins v. Bisignano
as 1:2025cv03102
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Jeniece Collins
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Humphreys v. Bisignano
as 4:2025cv05076
Plaintiff:
Kristy Humphreys
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
LaMarsh v. Bisignano
as 4:2025cv05077
Plaintiff:
Carie LaMarsh
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano and SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Alexandrou v. Bisignano
as 1:2025cv03098
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Sue Alexandrou
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Howell v. Bisignano
as 2:2025cv00225
Plaintiff:
Michael Howell
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gleason v. Bisignano
as 1:2025cv03095
Plaintiff:
John M Gleason
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
