US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Social Security Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 2,503
Hankins v. O'Malley
as 1:2023cv03203
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Hankins
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Nail v. O'Malley
as 2:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Richard James Nail
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dahlgren v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv05170
Plaintiff:
Samantha Dahlgren
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jaramillo v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03194
Plaintiff:
John P Jaramillo
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Schoessler v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv05169
Plaintiff:
Heidi Schoessler
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hughes v. O'Malley
as 1:2023cv03189
Plaintiff:
Jaxon Alan Hughes
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, SSA and Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Parish v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
April Parish
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pitzer v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv05158
Plaintiff:
Bradley Pitzer
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Garcia v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03182
Plaintiff:
Juan Garcia
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Crook v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03181
Plaintiff:
Tammy Crook
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
