US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 139
Chavez v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv05079
Plaintiff:
Margarita Chavez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
DeLong et al v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv00447
Plaintiff:
Teresa DeLong and Daniel DeLong
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Wilson v. Forthun et al
as 2:2010cv00267
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Wilson
Defendant:
Brad Forthun, Jane Doe Forthun, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Smasne et al v. Gomez et al
as 2:2010cv03027
Plaintiff:
Delores Smasne , Eugene Smasne and Mary Galaviz
Defendant:
Ruperto G Gomez, Jr and Jane Doe Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gregor v. Oscarson et al
as 2:2010cv00125
Plaintiff:
Thomas C Gregor
Defendant:
Nicholas W Oscarson, Jane Doe Oscarson and McKay Seed Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conrad v. Swenson et al
as 2:2010cv03019
Plaintiff:
Janette S Conrad
Defendant:
Katy L Swenson and John Doe Swenson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook et al v. Connor-Kent et al
as 2:2010cv03009
Plaintiff:
Timothy Cook and Laura Cook
Defendant:
Stephanie Connor-Kent and John Doe Kent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Sheldon et al v. Buljina et al
as 2:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
Jason Sheldon, Mary Sheldon and Sheldon Children 1-4
Defendant:
Smail Buljina, Jane Doe Buljina and Transpeed Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Asburry v. Heaton
as 2:2009cv00388
Plaintiff:
David Asburry
Defendant:
Chad Heaton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Grant v. Stalcup et al
as 2:2009cv00380
Plaintiff:
David FT Grant
Defendant:
Lloyd S Stalcup, Jane Doe Stalcup and ANS Transport Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
